樓主: kgv
|
試機 試鏡 相 |
發表於 2014-4-20 23:06:01
|
顯示全部樓層
| ||
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mcping/
|
||
| ||
發表於 2014-5-16 14:34:10
|
顯示全部樓層
點評
讚,$$ should be needed for a good coffee
Yeah ... 免費溜覽書屋 ... 不過 coffee or tea 要比錢 ;P
| ||
| ||
發表於 2014-5-17 17:20:14
|
顯示全部樓層
| ||
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mcping/
|
||
發表於 2014-5-17 17:46:31
|
顯示全部樓層
點評
等我遲d打多幾張再compare吓 ... :(
| ||
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mcping/
|
||
點評
Experienced users of these 2 lenses know what to expect and what possible remedies there are in post-processing.
My experience with 28/2A is that it has severe vignetting correction of which us necessary in a lot of shots.
It has a flatter field than 35FLE, which has severe and complex field curvature.
| ||
發表於 2014-6-7 22:07:00
|
顯示全部樓層
| ||
點評
What an expensive way to photograph a desk!
This is Noct 50/1.2 ;P
This is Noct 50/1.2 ;P
not the new lens ??? please show color photos with Kinop40......
| ||
點評
Waawaawaa !!!
| ||
點評
Nice lens!
| ||
| |
| ||
發表於 2014-9-20 02:14:00
|
顯示全部樓層
| ||
發表於 2014-9-20 02:14:56
|
顯示全部樓層
點評
師兄,您用得好好多好多!
| ||
點評
strongly different from other lenses
Yes, buy back ... and buy back is always more expensive :(
Buy back? It is good lens!
| ||
| ||
| ||
小黑屋|手機版|Archiver|mclassic.com.hk
GMT+8, 2024-11-2 17:36 , Processed in 0.025803 second(s), 17 queries .
Powered by Discuz! X3.4
© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.