Many details, high but not that high contrast for a modern lens. Extreme detail to the corners, personally it is a better lens than 11663 (but I am a 28mm freak)...
The pictures here is good demo
grandetech 發表於 2014-2-13 18:08
I haven't use 28 cron yet, wondering how it is better than 21 SEM if it is the best wide angle?
hahaaa, good question!!
That is why I said it is a personal thing.
In terms of sharpness, I would said probably not that far apart with 21mm clinically sharp and 28/2 more smooth, but 28/2 still allows some background blur when the main subject is close. To me, 21 SEM would be ultra high contrast and on contrast, I perfer the old version for my taste.
For me, I find 21mm much more difficult to master for most subjects on daily basis. Hence, I like 28/2 more.
grandetech 發表於 2014-2-13 18:54
Thanks for your kind comments, I have 21SEM and like it very much, but I will consider 28 cron as w ...
grandetech ching, I can only express what I know and feel based on actually experiences. If you are considering 28/2, please note that when I mentioned smooth, it is not less sharp nor less detail. You will know when you see the actual full size files.
The 21 SEM to me is the sharpest Leica 21 mm ever, regardless of brands. Too bad it is problem free only when used on Leica bodies i.e. a bit of issues when used on Sony.
發表於 2014-2-13 17:01:01
樓主
發表於 2014-2-14 00:29:32
